The map, and what happened
when it was measured.
Two views of the same corpus. The doctrine graph is the map that did not exist before this project: 173 constructs and 172 edges, every edge carrying a citation at both ends, showing which method derives from which, which are one construction wearing different names, and where the schools contradict each other. The collapse is what the measurement did to it: eighty-one named methods turn out to be seven independent voices.
loading…
What the doctrine graph is
Every node is a construct named in the primary sources and every link is a relation asserted by a page, not by us. DERIVES means one construct is built out of another; GROUNDS means a quantity or doctrine licenses a rule; SHARES_CONSTRUCTION and SHARES_MECHANISM mean two differently-named methods are doing the same thing; SPECIALISES means one is the other with a bound bolted on; CORROBORATES, PARTIALLY_CONTRADICTS and CONTRADICTS record where the tradition agrees and disagrees with itself.
An edge marked live is one that scores — it changes what a rule emits. An edge marked inert is recorded and cited but does not feed the run. Most of the graph is inert: it is a map of what the books claim, not a machine that trades. Nodes drawn with a coloured shell are the ones that reached the century run; their colour is their measured lift against their own null, red below chance and green above.